Hi Bev,
I noted an Innishanon junior school that has some good summaries of the roles there of the early families of Orr etc at: http://innishannonschool.com/ Hester Roe never lived in Australia that was James (1793-1835) whom Hannah referred to as William in NSW. He left Innishanon 20 years before. If she had ever been told he died in 1835 it had been forgotten. When at school it was said she could not be taught. If he had been still alive James as her eldest brother would have been her heir-at-law. There was at least another son who I will come to but he was dead before 1845. At the time and for many years before Hestor Roe lived in Dublin where the trial took place. She was in Innishannon at one time but later in Dublin. She gave evidence in the capacity of Hannah's sister. Hannah lived with her at various times and had been living with her up until 9 months before the trial when she went to live with a nephew and his mother. A marriage settlement in days of yore was money or property the father of the bride was obliged to settle on the husband to be before the marriage took place.
Trustees were always appointed to prevent him dealing with it later other than to mortgage it which is what Dowe did in 1808 with the 1774 settlement with the agreement of Parker name trustees as parties. James' identity is established by the motgage he owned when he died in 1835 entered into by his father William as mortgagor in 1808, by Hannah's knowledge her elder brother and legal heir was in NSW, albiet under the ground there, and by his death notice in the Kerry Evening News in 1836 that said that he had died at Parramatta in NSW and was of Innishannon. I do not know who the (1793-1834) James in the William/Mary Appleby tree was except he is very obviously a ring-in as there could not be two James' born in 1793. The 1793 is established by his age in the 1828 NSW census and age of 42 at death in 1835. The history of his children is really quite facinating. He had a grandaughter who was the central figure in what has been said to have been one of the three greatest unsolved murder cases in England in the 19th century - the geatest of course being Jack the Ripper. Her mariage settlement was in one place said to have been 20,000 pounds and in another 60,000. When her father died his probate was the 8th highest in value in England that year when it was estimated 50,000 wills had been probated and he also had a NSW probate and most likely a New Zealand one.
I am able to clarify what I wrote to the mail list the other night. Firstly there was a typo in respect of the date of the Lucas' Directory. It should have read 1787 not 1887. The relevant entries in it were - APPELBE, ALEXANDER, Cotton, Manufacturer, APPELBE, JOHN, Cotton Manufactuer & Timber Merchant, ORR, JAMES, Cotton-manufacturer ORR, WILLIAM, Cotton-manufacturer. Yesterday I got hold of a better copy of the Hannah Orr Commission of Lunacy held 11 Feb 1845 at the Four Courts in Dublin. Interestingly 5 months later a limited account of the hearing hit the newsstands in Sydney in Australia in the "Morning Chronicle" of 19 July 1845 - see it in the free online TROVE database. The inquiry was to determine whether she was a lunatic and whether she was entitled to a 60 pounds a year annuity and not as I had assumed on account of Hannah's recorded involvement in her brother-in-law's bankruptcy. The lunacy hearing was in fact instigated by the nephew with whom she was living with in Montgomery Street in Dublin, William Holmes Orr, whose father John Orr likewise to James (1793-1835) is also missing in all the Ancestry.com online trees that name children of William Srs 2nd marriage to Mary Appleby/Appelbe. I have no idea where any of the names came from that there exect of couse Mary Ann Drebble, and Hannah Or as no sourcess are given. There are several trees for the line of 1793-1835 born James who came to NSW in 1825 but none have any parents listed for him that should be William Sr and Mary Appleby. The father of William Holmes who made the application resulting in the hearing was by occupation an attorney-at-law and would have been deceased before the hearing as he was in 1847 when then 25 year-old William Holmes entered Grays Inn in London to study to become an advocate. He and his mother Margaret gave evidence. Her marriage is listed in Casey's volume 4 as in 1821 - Margaret Holmes Mathis to John Orr. Whilst in one account Hannah said he was her father's nephew he stated he was Hannah's nephew.
Hannah's half-brother (your William 1776-1842) as executor of his father's estate had always paid Hannah's 60 pounds P.A. lifetime annuity until his 1842 death. The executors of his will were his wife who lived on until 1851 and Kearns Deane of Cork City. So it would be Mary who must have refused to keep paying the annuity after her husband's death. Following the determination of the lunacy commission, as in law they they were jointly and severally liable, they would have been sued by a solicitor (or threatened) acting for Hannah and would have had to cough up probably 1200 pounds or so to meet the arrears and purchase an annuity for her from an insurance company. The terrible thing is that Hannah had known it was a lifetime annuity because her father had told he was leaving her one in his will. After her husband's death your ancestor Mary nee Browne seemingly would have said to poor simple Hannah - No, No, No go away - it was only payable during the life of my husband - I'm not looking after you let your own sisters and nieces and nephews do that. As the trial was well reported in Ireland - Irish Times, Cork Examiner etc. the news of what Mary had done to poor simple Hannah would have flashed through the village like a wildfire changing the residents perception of Mary forever. Lets face it - it was a straight fraud. A doctor who had examined Hannah said that he found her state of mind such that she could easily be defrauded.
In closing some other clarifications from the fully readable record are that Hannah's age was given as approx. 46 and her mother with whom Hannah had lived died in 1833. Of likely relevance to the names of the husband's of other daughters of Mary Appleby, Hannah said that for 3 months she had lived with a Mr. Buchanan in Innishannon before going to America and, then had spent two and a half years with Mrs. O'Shaughnessey in Cork. I noted in a K J Parker authored tree at Ancestry.com it was in effect said it had not been established William Sr had a second marriage to Mary Appbleby leaving open a possibility the William who married her was another William Orr. This 1845 trial report should dispel any doubt he had there. It was stated in one of the reports that Hannah was quote a - "daughter, by a second marriage of the late William Orr, of Innishannon, in the County of Cork, who died about the year 1814, leaving her a small property, about 60 pounds a year". Her father's will dated 11 June 1814 and three codicils were placed in evidence by an officer of the Prerogative Court.
Hannah may have been the simplist of the simple but she certainly made a good contibution to your genealogy.
cheers, John in Australia