Thank you for this information. There is a curious thing here. While Timothy Driscoll aged the appropriate 10 years between the 1901 and 1911 censuses, somehow John and (Jo)Hannah Driscoll aged 20! Could the fact John and Hannah are listed as unable to read and write account for getting their own ages wrong?
The information that Hannah is Timothy's stepmother also changes our narrative a bit. John and Hannah were married in 1874. In 1911 Timothy is listed as being 39 years old meaning he was born in 1872. So it appears both John and Hannah brought children from a previous marriage or partner.
We went from not knowing of Timothy's existence to thinking he was a prior child of Johanna's to the knowledge he was John's in less than a week!. Johanna had a previous daughter Mary and this story was well known in the family among Johanna's Driscoll grandchildren in the US. But no one apparently knew about Timothy! Begs the question why!
I would definitely like to obtain a copy, please send along instructions. And thank you for obtaining this information. I noticed that in the Baptism certificate for John and Johannas son Cornelius, Johns place of birth was listed as Droumaleena. Are there any ways to trace John from there?