Illegitimacy in the 1870s
In tracking my grandfather's birth cert for a dual passport application, I have done well. I found my great grandfather's name FRANK (not Francis) Walshand his wife, Margaret Farraher (or sometimes Farriher) and have myself visited their cottage in Shrule many times (listed as Brodella,Boherbee or Brodullahor Shrule--if someone can explain that to me I'd be grateful) but here's the thing: Frank was born in 1834, married Margaret in 1861 and dutifully (according to their baptismal records) produced:
Peter in 1863
Mary in 1866
Cath in 1868
John in 1873
Winny in 1875
Margaret in 1876
Pat Frank (a locally famous musician) in 1877
and the one I am searching for, Michael J Walsh in 1882. (I can't find a birth cert or baptismal record for him, naturally, and that the one I need! Any help would be very welcome before I have to cough up a fortune to someone over there to dig it up.)
But, here's the rub--in 1871, when old Frank seems to have given Margaret a break for breeding, another child named Mary was baptisedat Shrule, born of Margaret Henehan (!) and FRANK (not Francis) Walsh. Shrule is not a very big place and Frank (not the saintly Francis) not a usual name. Was this a bit of hanky-panky on Frank's part and would the Church have baptised an illegitimatechild born of the union between an unmarried woman and a married man? (It may be why Frank (died 1913) is buried in Shrule's St. Joe's cemetery with only his name on the tombstone?
Does anyone know about this sort of thing?
Thanks in advance...kittwalsh@yahoo.com
